I am so thankful to have had the privilege of attending Barb's lecture this week. I am still thinking about her words several days later. First of all, I am amazed by Barb and all of her accomplishments. Her perseverance in working hard to express her brilliant mind is inspiring. Barb's attitude is inspiring as well. She typed in the beginning of the lecture "...autism is my prism, not my prison".
There are a couple of things that I will take from Barb's words that will shape the teacher that I become. One important piece of advice to us was to enjoy our lunch. Do not be like a businessman juggling chainsaws frantically running around, but rather be like a native sitting in the grass enjoying nature. I have to admit that I have been much like the businessman these past couple of weeks. I have been running around like crazy trying to keep my head above water and finishing all of my final assignments. Barb's reminder to be more like Mary rather than busy Martha was so refreshing. I know that when I have my own class I will be tempted to be the chainsaw juggling businessman. However, I believe that it is so important to take a pause and delight in the world that surrounds us. Children need to see adults doing this. Children need to know that life is to be experienced and enjoyed, not rushed through. I hope to set this example when I am a teacher.
Another word of wisdom I will take away is that the world need autism. I need autism. I need those around me who think, act, and experience the world differently that I do. It is really easy for me to think that students I will have with special needs will need me. The truth is I will need them just as much. Barb also encouraged us to help students find out who they are and to help them be that on purpose. We must meet students where they are to connect with them. If students are mute or do not speak, join them in their silence until they are comfortable enough to express themselves.
Showing posts with label Kegan Butler. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Kegan Butler. Show all posts
Sunday, April 28, 2013
Monday, April 15, 2013
Unit 3 QTC Chapter 3
Chapter 3
(3.1) Personal and social development
can have a major influence on both individual student learning and the learning
environment as a whole. Identify a case from the CSEL guidelines* that
you would like to address in your paper. Then, examine the possible
developmental factors that could be influencing your target student(s) or
classroom in the case study. Consider all dimensions of personal and
social development, including cognitive, language, social, emotional, and
moral development. *CSEL guidelines can be found under CSEL Artifact. Cases
are included at the end of the document. Choose the case that best suits your
desired grade level.
I
will analyze the elementary education case study concerning Lisa’s disruptive
group behavior. Lisa seems to not have the ability to put herself in someone
else’s shoes or concern herself with the needs of her group members. This makes
it difficult for her to understand that everyone will take turns at having
different roles. She has difficulty seeing past what she wants in order to
contribute to her group. Also, Lisa may not have developed the emotions and
morals associated with sharing and contributing to a team. Another
developmental issue could be self-efficacy. Lisa may not want to contribute
because she feels that she would not be good at any other role other than the
one she wants.
(3.22) Check out tables 3.1 (p. 75), 3.2 (p. 83) and 3.3
(p. 91) with particular attention to the age ranges you are interested in
teaching. Identify your personal favorite ways that an educator can promote
a child’s sense of self, perspective taking, and moral reasoning
skills.
The first suggestion for kindergarten through 2nd
grade would be highly effective. The suggestion is to encourage students to
tackle challenging tasks that they think they can accomplish. Teachers should
also provide sufficient scaffolding to make this happen. Teachers and students
should agree upon achievable goals and work together to meet those goals.
Unit 3 QTC Chapter 2
Chapter 2
(2.1) One of the most cited theories
of human development is that of Swiss biologist Jean Piaget. After
reading about Piaget’s basic assumptions (p. 27-32) look with particular
attention at the stage of child development you would like to teach. The
other most cited theory of human development belongs to Russian
developmentalist Lev Vygotsky. Vygotsky’s theory of cognitive development
leads us to expect greater diversity among our same-aged students than
Piaget. Given these two influential theorists’ ideas on cognitive
development, how might you accommodate students who are not yet working at the
level of their peers?
I
would take a combination of Piaget and Vgotsky’s theories to accommodate a
student who is not yet working at the level of his or her peers. Piaget
believes that children are naturally motivated to learn. They learn actively.
According to Piaget, children construct their own knowledge rather than absorb
it. Piaget also believes that
students move through a set of cognitive development stages. Vgoytsky’s, on the
other hand, believes that adults systematically impart knowledge, culture, and
cognitive tools to children. Also, cognitive activities begin socially and
eventually move towards the internal.
I
think that is important to consider both perspectives in the classroom. It is
difficult for me to say how I would accommodate students who are not yet
working at the level of their peers without knowing my students personally.
However, I would try to harness a student’s already existing interest in a
subject matter and incorporate that interest into an area where they struggle.
Additionally, I think that social interaction is key in learning. So, I would
pair struggling students with students who are working at one level higher than
they are.
(2) Theories in educational
psychology promote the idea that language plays a critical role in cognitive
development. Examine Table 2.2 (p. 51), paying particular attention to
the age range that you are interested in teaching. Consider how you might
incorporate or adapt the strategies presented for use with your own students.
I would love to follow the first
suggestion for my age range that I am interested in which is to read
age-appropriate storybooks as a way of enhancing vocabulary. This is the age
where they are most engaged in being read aloud to. The next suggestion is to
give corrective feedback when students’ use of words indicates inaccurate
understanding. I feel that this suggestion should be used with caution. It is
important to make sure that the student receives a healthy balance of praise
and corrections. The next suggestion is to promote listening skills. This is a
challenging task for kindergarten to second graders. I will incorporate this
suggestion through teaching listening skills during reading, centers, and other
activities. I will ask follow-up questions to make sure students understand
important content. I will be careful when choosing my questions so as to not
feed the answer to my students. The last suggestion is to ask students to
construct narratives about recent events. I plan on asking students to write in
their class journals on Mondays about their weekend and Fridays about their
week.
Tuesday, April 9, 2013
Case Study #1
One of your 4th grade female students is very well developed physically and looks as if she is 15 instead of 9 years of age. Today you heard a group of 5th grade boys commenting on her body in a lewd and humiliating manner. Two other teachers also heard these comments but blew them off as "boys will be boys," and "she needs to get used to it."
I would be appalled if I heard another teacher say "she needs to get used to it" in reference to a nine year old girl or if another teacher excused the boys' behavior by saying "boys will be boys". These are examples of things we cannot say as educators or as models for young children. We must not enforce objectification of women by saying that it is just the way things are and everyone needs to adjust. The first step I would take in addressing this issue is to immediately talk to the boys as soon as I heard this conversation. I would arrange a meeting in the principal's office as soon as possible. I would discuss this issue with the principal as privately as possible as to not embarrass the girl further. I would have this discussion with the principal over the phone as well as over an email so I would have a written document of the situation. During the meeting, the principal and I would decide on an appropriate punishment. My suggestion would be that the boys would have to submit a one page single-spaced paper to both the principal and I with an apology and explanation of why his behavior was inappropriate. In the classroom, I would incorporate a character lesson on respect and specifically address the impact of lewd comments.
Monday, March 18, 2013
Chapter 10 QTC Kegan Butler
Chapter 10 QTC
10.1 List and describe the five essential conditions for
successful modeling.
10.2 Think about the three behaviors and skills that can be
learned through modeling. Give an example of how you will model a specific
behavior or task that falls under each category in your own classroom.
Chapter 9 QTC Kegan Butler
Chapter 9 QTC
9.1 When is it appropriate to use
extrinsic motivation?
9.2 Do you think that the process
of shaping would work just as well in a high school classroom as it would for
behaviors in an elementary classroom? Explain why or why not.
Monday, March 11, 2013
Chapter 8 QTC
8.1
Define creativity, convergent thinking, and divergent
thinking.
8.2
Do you think it is more important to promote convergent or
divergent thinking? Give examples of ways that you will help your students develop both ways of thinking in your
classroom.
Monday, March 4, 2013
QTC Chapter 7 Kegan Butler
1. The reason
you remember a party differently than a friend who attended the same event
could be attributed to _________________.
2. Give a
specific example of an authentic activity for problem-based learning and
project-based learning that you would use in your future classroom.
Monday, February 25, 2013
Chapter 6 QTC Kegan Butler
Lower-Order Thinking (Knowledge,
Understanding, Application):
What is working memory? How an we as
teachers use our knowledge of working memory to benefit our students and
influnece our instruction?
Higher-Order Thinking (Analysis,
Evaluation):
The text provides five reasons why students
forget important information. Give a brief description of each and come up with
a ways a teacher could combat these issues to benefit their students.
Monday, February 18, 2013
Kegan Butler QTC 15
(15.1) Turn to p. 559 in
Ormrod’s text. Now, imagine that you are meeting with Ingrid’s
grandmother today to explain her scores on the recent standardized achievement
test pictured at the bottom of p. 559. What will you tell her about Ingrid’s
performance? Her strengths? Her weaknesses? Even though this is not a
criterion-referenced test, if Ingrid’s grandmother asks you what she could be
doing at home to help strengthen Ingrid’s skills, what will you suggest?
First
of all, I would thank Ingrid’s grandmother for coming to meet me and for taking
an interest in her granddaughter’s education. I would praise her for her
involvement and encourage future involvement by telling her how important she
is to Ingrid’s success in school. Next I would share why I enjoy having Ingrid
in my class and give specific examples of ways that she is doing well. Then I
would begin to explain Ingrid’s test scores. I would first explain the “National
Percentile Bands” or confidence intervals, and how they reflect the amount of
error that could affect Ingrid’s percentile scores. Then I would discuss
reading comprehension, science and social studies because these are the
subjects where Ingrid scored the highest. I would say how impressive it is that
Ingrid scored well above average in these three subjects. Then I would discuss
math concepts, spelling, and math computation. These are the subjects that
Ingrid scored average to below average on. I would remind Ingrid’s grandmother
that there is a margin for error on these tests. These scores are not a reason
to worry, but I would like to take precautionary measures so that Ingrid does
not fall behind. I would then offer resources for Ingrid to work on at home in
order to improve in spelling and math computation, which are her weakest
subjects. Then I would thank Ingrid’s grandmother again for meeting with me and
encourage her to contact me if she has any questions.
Monday, February 11, 2013
Kegan Butler 14.1 and 14.2
14.1
14.2
My first instinct is to say that norm-referenced assessments are superior. Assessing students based off of the performance of their peers seems more reasonable than holding students accountable to a specific standard. Norm-referenced assessments can measure how students compare to one another not only in the local school but at a national level as well. One reason I like this type of assessment is because I do not think that it is necessarily fair to hold all students to one set criteria. The advantage of a norm-referenced assessment is that using this assessment makes clear how students compare with their peers. This helps teachers to know where their students are in comparison with one another so that they can better instruct their students. Teachers are better able to identify those students who are exceptionally gifted and those with disabilities. Another advantage is that this assessment can better account for test questions that are not appropriate for the student’s level. If all of the students miss that question, they are not penalized. Also, norm-referenced assessments help to account for questions that some students from a different cultural or socioeconomic background might not know the answer to. However, the disadvantage to norm-referenced assessment is that it does not show specifically what students have learned. Therefore, norm-referenced assessment would not be an accurate way to measure a students’ progress over a long period of time. Criterion-referenced assessments reveal exactly what students have learned. This type of assessment most accurately tracks students’ progress over time. Another advantage of the criterion-referenced assessment is that it best measures students’ mastery of the curriculum instead of their mastery in comparison with one another. I think that it would be helpful as a teacher to have both types of assessment so that you could benefit from both of their advantages while covering the gaps of their disadvantages.
In the classroom that I am observing in, the fourth grade
students are currently learning how to sequence events in a story in the order
in which they happened. If I were
giving a lesson on sequencing, I would first discuss with my students the meaning
and process of sequencing. Next I would give my students a fictional story to
read within a small group. As the students are reading, I would first perform
an informal assessment and ask the students questions about the order of events
in the story up to the point that they had read. After all the students had
finished reading, I would have them individually write about the story and the sequence
of events in their journal. Then I would have the students return to their
groups where I would give them several “events” from the story on colored
pieces of paper and have them lay the pieces of paper out in the order in which
they happened together. Lastly, I would have them individually sequence the
events in the story on a formal assessment such as a worksheet.
14.2
My first instinct is to say that norm-referenced assessments are superior. Assessing students based off of the performance of their peers seems more reasonable than holding students accountable to a specific standard. Norm-referenced assessments can measure how students compare to one another not only in the local school but at a national level as well. One reason I like this type of assessment is because I do not think that it is necessarily fair to hold all students to one set criteria. The advantage of a norm-referenced assessment is that using this assessment makes clear how students compare with their peers. This helps teachers to know where their students are in comparison with one another so that they can better instruct their students. Teachers are better able to identify those students who are exceptionally gifted and those with disabilities. Another advantage is that this assessment can better account for test questions that are not appropriate for the student’s level. If all of the students miss that question, they are not penalized. Also, norm-referenced assessments help to account for questions that some students from a different cultural or socioeconomic background might not know the answer to. However, the disadvantage to norm-referenced assessment is that it does not show specifically what students have learned. Therefore, norm-referenced assessment would not be an accurate way to measure a students’ progress over a long period of time. Criterion-referenced assessments reveal exactly what students have learned. This type of assessment most accurately tracks students’ progress over time. Another advantage of the criterion-referenced assessment is that it best measures students’ mastery of the curriculum instead of their mastery in comparison with one another. I think that it would be helpful as a teacher to have both types of assessment so that you could benefit from both of their advantages while covering the gaps of their disadvantages.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)